Designing Transit Maps

Ilya Bir­man

🔍 Start typing to search the book or go directly to a page by its number

It is convenient to navigate not only by scrolling, but also with the arrow keys:

 
between important places
Shift
between
pages
Ilya Bir­man

Designing
Transit
Maps

Bu­reau Gor­bunov Pub­lish­ing
2023
Ilya Birman

Designing
Transit
Maps

Bureau Gorbunov Publishing
2023
Ilya Bir­man
De­sign­ing Tran­sit Maps
Bu­reau Gor­bunov Pub­lish­ing, 2023

In­tro­duc­ing a new book re­leased by Bu­reau Gor­bunov Pub­lish­ing⁠—a practi­gal guide to tran­sit map de­sign. The book speaks of tran­sit map his­tory, im­por­tant prin­ci­ples of their de­sign, and how they evolve to­gether with their net­works. The au­thor talks about tech­niques: plot­ting the lines, de­not­ing the stops, choos­ing the fonts, and com­pos­ing the fi­nal poster.

Table of contents

Ilya Birman
Designing Transit Maps
Bureau Gorbunov Publishing, 2023

Introducing a new book released by Bureau Gorbunov Publishing⁠—a practigal guide to transit map design. The book speaks of transit map history, important principles of their design, and how they evolve together with their networks. The author talks about techniques: plotting the lines, denoting the stops, choosing the fonts, and composing the final poster.

Table of contents

1
The challenge

1
The challenge

This is a frag­ment of a clay tablet from the −13th cen­tury with a plan of Nip­pur, a sa­cred an­cient Sumer­ian city. It is now a city in Iraq.

The mankind used to dis­play re­al­ity on maps much ear­lier: there are known land maps from as long ago as −70th cen­tury, and one of the dis­cov­ered star maps of the sky is dated as far back as −145th century.

Map and reality

This is a fragment of a clay tablet from the −13th century with a plan of Nippur, a sacred ancient Sumerian city. It is now a city in Iraq.

The mankind used to display reality on maps much earlier: there are known land maps from as long ago as −70th century, and one of the discovered star maps of the sky is dated as far back as −145th century.

3 pages omitted
3 pages omit­ted

Earth from Electro‑L satellite

Af­ter a man has been in space, no doubt re­mained as to the true shape of the con­ti­nents, moun­tains, and seas. But no mat­ter how beau­ti­ful this pic­ture is, it is of lit­tle use for most prac­ti­cal applications.

Earth from Electro‑L satellite

After a man has been in space, no doubt remained as to the true shape of the continents, mountains, and seas. But no matter how beautiful this picture is, it is of little use for most practical applications.

17 pages omitted
17 pages omit­ted

Let’s look at this school plan. It is quite de­tailed: you can see the pe­cu­liar­i­ties of the build­ing shape, the wall struc­ture, the win­dows sec­tions. In the toi­lets, there is each stall and each uri­nal. In the li­brary, there is the lay­out of the bookshelves.

A wayfind­ing map, how­ever, is not a con­struc­tion draw­ing. It doesn't re­quire such de­tails. If the goal is to help the reader find the right room, the shape of the build­ing can be sim­pli­fied, the main cor­ri­dor can be en­larged, the toi­lets can be marked more clearly.

It’s eas­ier to nav­i­gate with the re­designed map. But if you need to pick the right di­men­sions for your of­fice fur­ni­ture, it will be misleading.

Let’s look at this school plan. It is quite detailed: you can see the peculiarities of the building shape, the wall structure, the windows sections. In the toilets, there is each stall and each urinal. In the library, there is the layout of the bookshelves.

A wayfinding map, however, is not a construction drawing. It doesn't require such details. If the goal is to help the reader find the right room, the shape of the building can be simplified, the main corridor can be enlarged, the toilets can be marked more clearly.

It’s easier to navigate with the redesigned map. But if you need to pick the right dimensions for your office furniture, it will be misleading.

3 pages omitted
3 pages omit­ted

The first transit maps

As com­mer­cial trans­port emerged, the task of show­ing routes clearly to help cus­tomers get from point A to point B be­came par­tic­u­larly im­por­tant. Maps of trans­porta­tion net­works be­came a way to ad­ver­tise them.

The frag­ment shown here is from Paris horse‑drawn coaches map, circa 1830. There are eleven lines, each des­ig­nated with its own color. Streets and city build­ings are vis­i­ble in the background.

The first transit maps

As commercial transport emerged, the task of showing routes clearly to help customers get from point A to point B became particularly important. Maps of transportation networks became a way to advertise them.

The fragment shown here is from Paris horse‑drawn coaches map, circa 1830. There are eleven lines, each designated with its own color. Streets and city buildings are visible in the background.

12 pages omitted
12 pages omit­ted

Henry Beck, 1965. Photo by Ken Garland

Beck’s sketch, 1931
Victoria and Albert Museum

In the early 1930s, Henry Beck (for friends, Harry), a en­gi­neer­ing drafts­man at the Lon­don Un­der­ground sig­nals of­fice, be­gan work­ing on a full di­a­gram of all the ser­vices then in operation.

He drew all the lines to an­gles di­vis­i­ble by 45°, and even the Thames had to obey this rule. This seems to be the first time any­one has given up ge­og­ra­phy on a city‑wide map.

Beck’s sketch, 1931
Victoria and Albert Museum

In the early 1930s, Henry Beck (for friends, Harry), a engineering draftsman at the London Underground signals office, began working on a full diagram of all the services then in operation.

He drew all the lines to angles divisible by 45°, and even the Thames had to obey this rule. This seems to be the first time anyone has given up geography on a city‑wide map.

Henry Beck, 1965. Photo by Ken Garland

4 pages omitted
4 pages omit­ted

Transit map diversity

Beck’s work has made a huge im­pact on wayfind­ing de­sign. Al­though he was not the first to draw a non‑ge­o­graph­i­cal map, he was the one who went down in his­tory as the in­ven­tor of such maps. Per­haps the rea­son is that he was the first to suc­cess­fully de­pict the un­der­ground rail­ways of a big city in this way.

Ed­ward Tufte ad­mires Beck’s map and writes that its de­sign can hardly be repli­cated. I wouldn’t say so: dozens of com­plex trans­porta­tion sys­tems in the world are suc­cess­fully us­ing Beck’s prin­ci­ples. And when we hear “sub­way map”, we imag­ine a Beck‑like design.

“For ap­par­ently quite a num­ber of peo­ple, the map or­ga­nized Lon­don (rather than Lon­don or­ga­niz­ing the map). De­spite 70 years of re­vi­sion due to ex­ten­sions of the Un­der­ground and bu­reau­cratic tin­ker­ing (the mar­ket­ing de­part­ment wrecked the map for sev­eral years), the map nicely sur­vives to this day.

Later Eu­ro­pean and Amer­i­can knock‑offs did not suc­ceed at all. The Un­der­ground Map and Mi­nard’s fa­mous Carte Fig­u­ra­tive of the French Army’s dis­as­ter in Rus­sia in the war of 1812 are alike in im­por­tant re­spects: both are bril­liant, and nei­ther trav­els well. The Un­der­ground Map and Napoleon’s March are per­fectly at­tuned to their par­tic­u­lar data, so fo­cused on their data sets.”

Transit map diversity

Beck’s work has made a huge impact on wayfinding design. Although he was not the first to draw a non‑geographical map, he was the one who went down in history as the inventor of such maps. Perhaps the reason is that he was the first to successfully depict the underground railways of a big city in this way.

Edward Tufte admires Beck’s map and writes that its design can hardly be replicated. I wouldn’t say so: dozens of complex transportation systems in the world are successfully using Beck’s principles. And when we hear “subway map”, we imagine a Beck‑like design.

“For apparently quite a number of people, the map organized London (rather than London organizing the map). Despite 70 years of revision due to extensions of the Underground and bureaucratic tinkering (the marketing department wrecked the map for several years), the map nicely survives to this day.

Later European and American knock‑offs did not succeed at all. The Underground Map and Minard’s famous Carte Figurative of the French Army’s disaster in Russia in the war of 1812 are alike in important respects: both are brilliant, and neither travels well. The Underground Map and Napoleon’s March are perfectly attuned to their particular data, so focused on their data sets.”

6 pages omitted
6 pages omit­ted

The Moscow Metro has its own pe­cu­liar­ity. For his­tor­i­cal rea­sons, the plat­forms of dif­fer­ent lines at an in­ter­change are con­sid­ered dif­fer­ent sta­tions and of­ten carry dif­fer­ent names. In Lon­don, it is enough to mark a com­plex in­ter­change with one sym­bol and one la­bel, while in Moscow, the dis­play of a com­plex in­ter­change be­comes a problem.

In ad­di­tion, un­like in Lon­don or Paris, in Moscow it is nec­es­sary to dub the names in Ro­man script.

As a re­sult, the num­ber of la­bels to be placed in­creases man­i­fold. On the vast Lon­don map, la­bels never cross lines. To fol­low such a rule in Moscow, it would be nec­es­sary to re­duce the font size to tiny and sig­nif­i­cantly com­pli­cate the line geom­e­try. There­fore Moscow has to use trans­par­ent plates un­der some labels.

Overlapping and plaques:

Moscow. 4 lines intersect, 8 labels used

London. 6 lines intersect, 1 label used

The Moscow Metro has its own peculiarity. For historical reasons, the platforms of different lines at an interchange are considered different stations and often carry different names. In London, it is enough to mark a complex interchange with one symbol and one label, while in Moscow, the display of a complex interchange becomes a problem.

In addition, unlike in London or Paris, in Moscow it is necessary to dub the names in Roman script.

As a result, the number of labels to be placed increases manifold. On the vast London map, labels never cross lines. To follow such a rule in Moscow, it would be necessary to reduce the font size to tiny and significantly complicate the line geometry. Therefore Moscow has to use transparent plates under some labels.

Moscow. 4 lines intersect, 8 labels used

London. 6 lines intersect, 1 label used

Overlapping and plaques:

7 pages omitted
7 pages omit­ted

Greater Tokyo Railways
Meik

Greater Tokyo Railways
Meik

4 pages omitted
4 pages omit­ted

Station lifts diagram

At mod­ern sta­tions, pas­sen­gers on wheel­chairs and with strollers get to en­joy step‑free ac­cess to all lines. This is the lift di­a­gram of Lon­don’s King’s Cross St. Pan­cras sta­tion, where six lines intersect.

Us­ing the di­a­gram, you can un­der­stand that if you need to go from Vic­to­ria Line to Met­ro­pol­i­tan Line, you need to take lift K, then H, then go far down the lobby to lift F and go down to the plat­form on it.

Station lifts diagram

At modern stations, passengers on wheelchairs and with strollers get to enjoy step‑free access to all lines. This is the lift diagram of London’s King’s Cross St. Pancras station, where six lines intersect.

Using the diagram, you can understand that if you need to go from Victoria Line to Metropolitan Line, you need to take lift K, then H, then go far down the lobby to lift F and go down to the platform on it.

1 page omitted
1 page omit­ted

Map as a symbol

In dis­cussing the map’s func­tion so far, we have only touched on logic, but not aesthetics.

This is the of­fi­cial pub­lic tran­sit map of Chelyabinsk, Rus­sia. It looks re­pul­sive. Imag­ine the pain of hav­ing to use it when there is no one to help you.

‘South Ural State University’ bus stop, 2018

Map as a symbol

In discussing the map’s function so far, we have only touched on logic, but not aesthetics.

This is the official public transit map of Chelyabinsk, Russia. It looks repulsive. Imagine the pain of having to use it when there is no one to help you.

‘South Ural State University’ bus stop, 2018

6 pages omitted
6 pages omit­ted

The Moscow’s cir­cu­lar Cir­cle Line has in­spired the de­sign­ers to make the new wayfind­ing prod­ucts of a cir­cu­lar shape. In 2016 or so, the cir­cu­lar pedes­trian wayfind­ing totems started to ap­pear in Moscow.

Circular stela on Kuznetsky Most station. Design by Billings Jackson and City ID

Circular stela on Kuznetsky Most station. Design by Billings Jackson and City ID

The Moscow’s circular Circle Line has inspired the designers to make the new wayfinding products of a circular shape. In 2016 or so, the circular pedestrian wayfinding totems started to appear in Moscow.

8 pages omitted
8 pages omit­ted

Even the tem­po­rary sig­nage for bus dri­vers dur­ing road works are set in Trans­port for Lon­don’s brand font. The shape of the ar­row is also standard.

Even the temporary signage for bus drivers during road works are set in Transport for London’s brand font. The shape of the arrow is also standard.

14 pages omitted
14 pages omit­ted

Finding a solution

Tran­sit map de­sign is hardly a typ­i­cal ex­er­cise in in­for­ma­tion display.

All tran­sit sys­tems have their own quirks: ob­scure in­ter­changes, un­usual timeta­bles for cer­tain routes, one‑way stops, tricky fares. We need to show it all in a way that no one is in­tim­i­dated or con­fused by.

The aes­thet­ics, as we dis­cussed above, are also de­mand­ing: the de­sign must be recog­nis­able and dis­tinc­tive so that it works for the brand im­age of the tran­sit agency and the city itself.

Those who never dealt with tran­sit maps might think: there is a lim­ited num­ber of el­e­ments, clear re­la­tion­ships be­tween them, a set of re­quire­ments for an­gles and col­ors. Aes­thet­ics aside, shouldn’t it be pos­si­ble for an al­go­rithm to find the op­ti­mal arrangement?

So far, the an­swer is no. The ac­tual de­sign process usu­ally in­volves a lengthy trial and er­ror. Some­times an un­ex­pected so­lu­tion suc­ceeds⁠—look at New York City. And what­ever the so­lu­tion, there will nec­es­sar­ily be small ex­cep­tions that the com­puter will never think of.

New York City Subway map:

Finding a solution

Transit map design is hardly a typical exercise in information display.

All transit systems have their own quirks: obscure interchanges, unusual timetables for certain routes, one‑way stops, tricky fares. We need to show it all in a way that no one is intimidated or confused by.

The aesthetics, as we discussed above, are also demanding: the design must be recognisable and distinctive so that it works for the brand image of the transit agency and the city itself.

Those who never dealt with transit maps might think: there is a limited number of elements, clear relationships between them, a set of requirements for angles and colors. Aesthetics aside, shouldn’t it be possible for an algorithm to find the optimal arrangement?

So far, the answer is no. The actual design process usually involves a lengthy trial and error. Sometimes an unexpected solution succeeds⁠—look at New York City. And whatever the solution, there will necessarily be small exceptions that the computer will never think of.

New York City Subway map:

When I started work­ing on my first Moscow Metro map in 2006, it seemed to me that I had to find a way to con­nect the sta­tions with lines mak­ing as few bends as pos­si­ble, and then put la­bels next to them.

At the time, I used the in­ter­changes as con­ve­nient piv­ots for line bends.

How it should be:

When I started working on my first Moscow Metro map in 2006, it seemed to me that I had to find a way to connect the stations with lines making as few bends as possible, and then put labels next to them.

At the time, I used the interchanges as convenient pivots for line bends.

How it should be:

Moscow’s official map, 2005

In Moscow, of­fi­cial maps would al­ways de­pict each plat­form as a sep­a­rate cir­cle with a la­bel next to it.

To sim­plify the map’s geom­e­try, I de­cided to de­pict en­tire in­ter­changes with sin­gu­lar circles.

The prob­lem is, sta­tions of the same in­ter­change hub can have dif­fer­ent names, so I had to put boxes with lists of those names at such hubs.

On the difficulties of labeling Moscow stations:

Moscow’s official map, 2005

In Moscow, official maps would always depict each platform as a separate circle with a label next to it.

To simplify the map’s geometry, I decided to depict entire interchanges with singular circles.

The problem is, stations of the same interchange hub can have different names, so I had to put boxes with lists of those names at such hubs.

On the difficulties of labeling Moscow stations:

12 pages omitted
12 pages omit­ted

Version 3.508

Version 3.510

Version 3.516

Version 3.517

Version 3.530

Version 3.577

Version 3.691

When the shape of the Lenin Li­brary in­ter­change was found, I moved on to find­ing the place­ment for the other in­ter­changes and their labels.

In the first ver­sion of the Lubyanka in­ter­change, the la­bel Кузнецкий Мост over­laps the pur­ple line.

I break the la­bel into two lines, but it be­comes cramped be­tween the red and pur­ple lines.

So I flip the plat­forms to make the in­ter­change breathe more freely.

Now I try to put Кузнецкий Мост closer to the sta­tion and move the ro­man­ized la­bel far­ther away. This clearly looks bet­ter. I will re­arrange all the la­bels this way later.

Chang­ing the an­gle of the in­ter­change al­lows for mak­ing the la­bel left‑aligned, which is eas­ier to read.

Next, I make the in­ter­change pas­sage shorter. When there are only two plat­forms to con­nect, it looks neater than a long one. How­ever, the vi­sual con­nec­tion be­tween the left‑aligned la­bel and the sta­tion gets rather loose.

At some point later, I put all the Russ­ian la­bels next to the sta­tions push­ing the ro­man­ized ones away. Кузнецкий Мост got cen­tered, and now works well.

Version 3.508

Version 3.510

Version 3.516

Version 3.517

Version 3.530

Version 3.577

Version 3.691

When the shape of the Lenin Library interchange was found, I moved on to finding the placement for the other interchanges and their labels.

In the first version of the Lubyanka interchange, the label Кузнецкий Мост overlaps the purple line.

I break the label into two lines, but it becomes cramped between the red and purple lines.

So I flip the platforms to make the interchange breathe more freely.

Now I try to put Кузнецкий Мост closer to the station and move the romanized label farther away. This clearly looks better. I will rearrange all the labels this way later.

Changing the angle of the interchange allows for making the label left‑aligned, which is easier to read.

Next, I make the interchange passage shorter. When there are only two platforms to connect, it looks neater than a long one. However, the visual connection between the left‑aligned label and the station gets rather loose.

At some point later, I put all the Russian labels next to the stations pushing the romanized ones away. Кузнецкий Мост got centered, and now works well.

10 pages omitted
10 pages omit­ted

In the next part, let’s talk about prin­ci­ples a map can be made by: what kind of trans­port is shown, what geom­e­try the lines have, how col­ors are used. These are usu­ally the first things to con­sider, be­cause they will be dif­fi­cult to change in the later stages of de­sign. De­tails like a font used for la­bels or spe­cific shades of col­ors could be de­cided later.

Yet the ex­am­ple the Lenin Li­brary in­ter­change shows that some­times this is not the case: dif­fi­cul­ties with de­tails lead to a re­vi­sion of the prin­ci­ples. Every­thing af­fects everything.

In the next part, let’s talk about principles a map can be made by: what kind of transport is shown, what geometry the lines have, how colors are used. These are usually the first things to consider, because they will be difficult to change in the later stages of design. Details like a font used for labels or specific shades of colors could be decided later.

Yet the example the Lenin Library interchange shows that sometimes this is not the case: difficulties with details lead to a revision of the principles. Everything affects everything.

1 page omitted
1 page omit­ted

2
The principle

2
The principle

Correspondence between lines and routes

This is how they used to de­sign tran­sit maps in Russ­ian tram de­pots and bus parks: they took the city map, then traced all the roads with tran­sit ser­vices, then put the route num­bers along the lines or at the stops.

It’s easy to make a map like this, but it’s in­con­ve­nient to use. For ex­am­ple, try to fol­low the route of tram 15.

When there are many routes in a sin­gle line, every in­ter­sec­tion is disorienting.

This tram map was used in Chelyabinsk until 2018

Correspondence between lines and routes

This is how they used to design transit maps in Russian tram depots and bus parks: they took the city map, then traced all the roads with transit services, then put the route numbers along the lines or at the stops.

It’s easy to make a map like this, but it’s inconvenient to use. For example, try to follow the route of tram 15.

When there are many routes in a single line, every intersection is disorienting.

This tram map was used in Chelyabinsk until 2018

5 pages omitted
5 pages omit­ted

The de­ci­sion about what to count and de­pict as a sep­a­rate line is not an en­gi­neer­ing de­ci­sion, but a purely de­sign one. The de­sign of a map has great power and af­fects pas­sen­gers’ per­cep­tion of reality.

In Copen­hagen, the sit­u­a­tion is sim­i­lar to that in Stock­holm: many com­muter trains pass through the same set of sta­tions in the city cen­ter, but branch off dif­fer­ently in the sub­urbs. But in this case, each route is drawn sep­a­rately, so pas­sen­gers prob­a­bly won’t con­sider it “branch­ing off”.

The ad­van­tage of this de­sign is that you don’t have to think about routes: there are only lines. The dis­ad­van­tage is the ab­surdly thick line bundles.

Copenhagen commuter trains, 2006

Copenhagen commuter trains, 2006

The decision about what to count and depict as a separate line is not an engineering decision, but a purely design one. The design of a map has great power and affects passengers’ perception of reality.

In Copenhagen, the situation is similar to that in Stockholm: many commuter trains pass through the same set of stations in the city center, but branch off differently in the suburbs. But in this case, each route is drawn separately, so passengers probably won’t consider it “branching off”.

The advantage of this design is that you don’t have to think about routes: there are only lines. The disadvantage is the absurdly thick line bundles.

1 page omitted
1 page omit­ted

If every pos­si­ble Dis­trict line route was de­picted as a sep­a­rate line, the map would get too complicated.

If every possible District line route was depicted as a separate line, the map would get too complicated.

11 pages omitted
11 pages omit­ted

Color coding

In tra­di­tional car­tog­ra­phy, the mean­ing of a line is in­di­cated by its style. De­pend­ing on the thick­ness, pat­tern, and crooked­ness of the line, we know whether we are look­ing at a road, river, bor­der, or meridian.

Siberia
John Bartholomew, 1922
Rumsey

Color coding

In traditional cartography, the meaning of a line is indicated by its style. Depending on the thickness, pattern, and crookedness of the line, we know whether we are looking at a road, river, border, or meridian.

Siberia
John Bartholomew, 1922
Rumsey

7 pages omitted
7 pages omit­ted

The most an­noy­ing sin­gle‑word color is yel­low. It is lighter than any other color, so you al­most can’t read white text on it. To fix this, we can make an ex­cep­tion and al­ways use black on yellow.

Worse yet, yel­low it­self is poorly vis­i­ble on a light back­ground. Putting the whole map on a dark back­ground just for the leg­i­bil­ity of yel­low is an un­rea­son­able measure.

When a yel­low line ap­peared on the Lon­don Un­der­ground map, it was drawn with a thin black out­line. The old New York City Sub­way maps did with­out one.

In to­day’s maps, it’s the other way around: no out­line in Lon­don, but there is one in New York City.

Out­lin­ing is a valid car­to­graphic tech­nique, but it usu­ally looks in­el­e­gant on di­a­gram­matic tran­sit maps. It is odd when among the same type of ob­jects, one sud­denly gets a spe­cial designation.

To make a yel­low line more clear with­out an out­line, it’s bet­ter to make the yel­low darker. How­ever, when you darken a yel­low, you get an un­pleas­ant muddy swamp color. Fix this by shift­ing the hue to­wards orange:

Too light yellow

Darker: muddy swamp

Darker and more orange: good yellow

Yellow line with a black outline. London, 1950

Yellow line without an outline. New York City, 1979

Yellow line without an outline. London, 2018

Yellow line with a black outline. New York City, 2018

Yellow line with a black outline. London, 1950

Yellow line without an outline. New York City, 1979

Yellow line without an outline. London, 2018

Yellow line with a black outline. New York City, 2018

The most annoying single‑word color is yellow. It is lighter than any other color, so you almost can’t read white text on it. To fix this, we can make an exception and always use black on yellow.

Worse yet, yellow itself is poorly visible on a light background. Putting the whole map on a dark background just for the legibility of yellow is an unreasonable measure.

When a yellow line appeared on the London Underground map, it was drawn with a thin black outline. The old New York City Subway maps did without one.

In today’s maps, it’s the other way around: no outline in London, but there is one in New York City.

Outlining is a valid cartographic technique, but it usually looks inelegant on diagrammatic transit maps. It is odd when among the same type of objects, one suddenly gets a special designation.

To make a yellow line more clear without an outline, it’s better to make the yellow darker. However, when you darken a yellow, you get an unpleasant muddy swamp color. Fix this by shifting the hue towards orange:

Too light yellow

Darker: muddy swamp

Darker and more orange: good yellow

16 pages omitted
16 pages omit­ted

Geometry

This anx­ious map shows Bu­dapest's metro lines, as well as bus, trol­ley­bus, and tram routes. The lines are re­al­is­ti­cally shaped as they run through streets and past parks.

This is a ge­o­graph­i­cal map.

Geometry

This anxious map shows Budapest's metro lines, as well as bus, trolleybus, and tram routes. The lines are realistically shaped as they run through streets and past parks.

This is a geographical map.

3 pages omitted
3 pages omit­ted
  • London Underground, designed by Henry Beck

45°

Helsinki trams

30°

Schukino surface transport, my design, abandoned

22,5°

Luxembourg buses, designed by Jug Cerović, VDL

18°

Moscow’s ‘Magistral’ bus network, designed by Constantine Konovalov, 2018

15°

The future metro of Turin, designed by Chris Smere

60°

Train network of Melbourne, designed by Philip Mallis

90°

The main way to make a map geo­met­ri­cal is to em­ploy an an­gle grid, i. e. al­low the line seg­ments to run only at a par­tic­u­lar set of angles.

The most com­mon is the 45‑de­gree grid used by Beck in the Lon­don map: lines run at an­gles that are mul­ti­ple of 45°.

The Helsinki map from the pre­vi­ous page has a 30‑de­gree grid.

I tried 22,5° on the Schukino map. I needed ex­tra flex­i­bil­ity, be­cause I was draw­ing streets and wanted to de­pict them close to re­al­ity for recognizability.

On the Lux­em­bourg map, the grid step is 18°. Even this fine grid doesn’t give the im­pres­sion of dis­or­der. First, there are many line seg­ments at each of the al­lowed an­gles. Sec­ond, from the very cen­ter run the bold lines at most of the al­lowed an­gles. We no­tice this straight away, un­der­stand the struc­ture, and see the beauty in it.

The ‘Magis­tral’ map is also beau­ti­ful, but its 15‑de­gree grid is not work­ing that well: there are too few lines and too many bends on them to no­tice that some seg­ments are par­al­lel to each other. It seems that the lines just bend wher­ever and how­ever they please.

Usu­ally the an­gles that are di­viders of 90° are used. This way you can be sure to have the hor­i­zon­tals and ver­ti­cals al­lowed. If you pick a 60‑de­gree an­gle grid, you can’t do that.

Fi­nally, you can leave only hor­i­zon­tals and verticals.

  • London Underground, designed by Henry Beck

45°

Helsinki trams

30°

Schukino surface transport, my design, abandoned

22,5°

Luxembourg buses, designed by Jug Cerović, VDL

18°

Moscow’s ‘Magistral’ bus network, designed by Constantine Konovalov, 2018

15°

The future metro of Turin, designed by Chris Smere

60°

Train network of Melbourne, designed by Philip Mallis

90°

The main way to make a map geometrical is to employ an angle grid, i. e. allow the line segments to run only at a particular set of angles.

The most common is the 45‑degree grid used by Beck in the London map: lines run at angles that are multiple of 45°.

The Helsinki map from the previous page has a 30‑degree grid.

I tried 22,5° on the Schukino map. I needed extra flexibility, because I was drawing streets and wanted to depict them close to reality for recognizability.

On the Luxembourg map, the grid step is 18°. Even this fine grid doesn’t give the impression of disorder. First, there are many line segments at each of the allowed angles. Second, from the very center run the bold lines at most of the allowed angles. We notice this straight away, understand the structure, and see the beauty in it.

The ‘Magistral’ map is also beautiful, but its 15‑degree grid is not working that well: there are too few lines and too many bends on them to notice that some segments are parallel to each other. It seems that the lines just bend wherever and however they please.

Usually the angles that are dividers of 90° are used. This way you can be sure to have the horizontals and verticals allowed. If you pick a 60‑degree angle grid, you can’t do that.

Finally, you can leave only horizontals and verticals.

18 pages omitted
18 pages omit­ted

Orientation

Orientation

Tra­di­tion­ally, maps are drawn with north fac­ing up­ward. If you change the usual map ori­en­ta­tion, well‑known places will look unfamiliar.

In the case of tran­sit maps, es­pe­cially geo­met­ri­cal ones, the no­tion of ori­en­ta­tion is some­what fuzzy. The lines run at the an­gles the map de­sign re­quires, and those an­gles can be quite dif­fer­ent from the ac­tual ones. It makes sense to ro­tate the map so that it is eas­ier to read, re­mem­ber, or even so that it bet­ter fits the format.

Orientation

Traditionally, maps are drawn with north facing upward. If you change the usual map orientation, well‑known places will look unfamiliar.

In the case of transit maps, especially geometrical ones, the notion of orientation is somewhat fuzzy. The lines run at the angles the map design requires, and those angles can be quite different from the actual ones. It makes sense to rotate the map so that it is easier to read, remember, or even so that it better fits the format.

10 pages omitted
10 pages omit­ted

Scope

Some tran­sit sys­tems are too com­plex to be shown on a sin­gle map. A good way to keep things sim­ple is to limit the scope of the map, that is, show less stuff.

For ex­am­ple, you can show just the night routes. At night, pas­sen­gers don’t care what runs dur­ing the day: they need to get some­where right now. Sep­a­rate day­time and night­time maps are sim­pler be­cause you don’t have to spec­ify which route runs when. This works when there is a clear di­vi­sion be­tween day and night routes.

Japan’s night ferries map
Tripadvisor

Scope

Some transit systems are too complex to be shown on a single map. A good way to keep things simple is to limit the scope of the map, that is, show less stuff.

For example, you can show just the night routes. At night, passengers don’t care what runs during the day: they need to get somewhere right now. Separate daytime and nighttime maps are simpler because you don’t have to specify which route runs when. This works when there is a clear division between day and night routes.

Japan’s night ferries map
Tripadvisor

10 pages omitted
10 pages omit­ted

Granularity

The prin­ci­ples of Henry Beck’s Lon­don map, such as dis­card­ing ge­og­ra­phy and con­form­ing lines to 45° an­gles, were a re­sponse to the grow­ing com­plex­ity and size of the un­der­ground. But thought­less copy­ing of these prin­ci­ples makes no sense. The map shown here adds lit­tle to a mere comma‑sep­a­rated list of sta­tions: Al­abin­skaya, Rossiyskaya, Moskovskaya...

Samara, Russia

Granularity

The principles of Henry Beck’s London map, such as discarding geography and conforming lines to 45° angles, were a response to the growing complexity and size of the underground. But thoughtless copying of these principles makes no sense. The map shown here adds little to a mere comma‑separated list of stations: Alabinskaya, Rossiyskaya, Moskovskaya...

Samara, Russia

7 pages omitted
7 pages omit­ted

With platform precision. Map 3.0

In Moscow’s of­fi­cial map, the gran­u­lar­ity is even higher: a sep­a­rate cir­cle rep­re­sents each plat­form, even with a com­mon name.

This so­lu­tion re­moves the un­am­bigu­ous one‑to‑one cor­re­spon­dence be­tween the plat­form cir­cle and the la­bel. The reader has to guess. In gen­eral the map be­comes more com­pli­cated: even the sim­plest in­ter­change is a “peanut”, not a circle.

With track precision. In 100 years

The poster “Moscow metro in 100 years” is even more gran­u­lar: not just plat­forms, but in­di­vid­ual tracks are de­picted. On cross‑plat­form sta­tions, such as Третьяковская, one plat­form serves dif­fer­ent lines. In such cases, the lines are cut in half to pass through the cor­rect platforms.

Art. Lebedev Studio

With platform precision. Map 3.0

In Moscow’s official map, the granularity is even higher: a separate circle represents each platform, even with a common name.

This solution removes the unambiguous one‑to‑one correspondence between the platform circle and the label. The reader has to guess. In general the map becomes more complicated: even the simplest interchange is a “peanut”, not a circle.

With track precision. In 100 years

The poster “Moscow metro in 100 years” is even more granular: not just platforms, but individual tracks are depicted. On cross‑platform stations, such as Третьяковская, one platform serves different lines. In such cases, the lines are cut in half to pass through the correct platforms.

Art. Lebedev Studio

7 pages omitted
7 pages omit­ted

Freedom

Hav­ing a prin­ci­ple is im­por­tant for good de­sign. With­out it, the de­sign looks ran­dom. But a prin­ci­ple is not an end in it­self, it is just a tool for mak­ing de­ci­sions. A prin­ci­ple can tie de­sign­ers’ hands.

We should not fear free­dom. It’s nor­mal to make an ex­cep­tion to any prin­ci­ple or to com­bine dif­fer­ent prin­ci­ples on the same map if the map would ben­e­fit from it.

Freedom

Having a principle is important for good design. Without it, the design looks random. But a principle is not an end in itself, it is just a tool for making decisions. A principle can tie designers’ hands.

We should not fear freedom. It’s normal to make an exception to any principle or to combine different principles on the same map if the map would benefit from it.

10 pages omitted
10 pages omit­ted

When the prin­ci­ple is ob­vi­ous to the reader, the map is eas­ier to read un­am­bigu­ously. But some­times if you fol­low the prin­ci­ple blindly, the re­sult could turn out confusing.

Con­sider the mod­ern Lon­don Tube map. On prin­ci­ple, non‑trans­fer sta­tions here are de­noted by ticks, and trans­fer sta­tions are de­noted by black circles.

For ex­am­ple, the District line and the Piccadilly line have a com­mon sec­tion but run in sep­a­rate tun­nels. Even at iden­ti­cally named sta­tions, there is no trans­fer: you have to exit to the city and re‑en­ter. In­ter­change sta­tions are ex­plic­itly de­noted with black circles.

The District line and the Circle line also have a com­mon sec­tion, but they share the same tracks. You can change at any sta­tion: trains of the two lines ar­rive in turns.

It would be log­i­cal to show all shared sta­tions as in­ter­changes, but it would over­com­pli­cate the map.

Only sta­tions where you can also trans­fer some­where else are marked with cir­cles. In other cases, it is just as­sumed be­cause the two lines are stitched in a bun­dle. If a pas­sen­ger doesn’t get this and de­cides that it is pos­si­ble to trans­fer only at sta­tions with cir­cles, no big deal: they will be able to trans­fer anyway.

When the principle is obvious to the reader, the map is easier to read unambiguously. But sometimes if you follow the principle blindly, the result could turn out confusing.

Consider the modern London Tube map. On principle, non‑transfer stations here are denoted by ticks, and transfer stations are denoted by black circles.

For example, the District line and the Piccadilly line have a common section but run in separate tunnels. Even at identically named stations, there is no transfer: you have to exit to the city and re‑enter. Interchange stations are explicitly denoted with black circles.

The District line and the Circle line also have a common section, but they share the same tracks. You can change at any station: trains of the two lines arrive in turns.

It would be logical to show all shared stations as interchanges, but it would overcomplicate the map.

Only stations where you can also transfer somewhere else are marked with circles. In other cases, it is just assumed because the two lines are stitched in a bundle. If a passenger doesn’t get this and decides that it is possible to transfer only at stations with circles, no big deal: they will be able to transfer anyway.

1 page omitted
1 page omit­ted

On my main Moscow metro map, the tick of Смоленская (Smolen­skaya) sta­tion on the Filyovskaya line sticks out from its line a lit­tle bit less than the other ticks on the map.

If I had made this tick as big as the oth­ers, it would have tapped the Arbatsko-Pokrovskaya line. Some could have thought that there was a trans­fer be­tween the stations.

If I made all the ticks on the map as short as this one, the whole map would be less legible.

If I had in­creased the dis­tance be­tween the two lines, I would have had to en­large the cap­sule that des­ig­nates the fol­low­ing Киевская (Kievskaya) sta­tion, which both lines pass. But I didn’t want to make the des­ig­na­tion heavier.

In good graphic de­sign, the gen­eral af­fects the par­tic­u­lar, not the other way around. There­fore, it is bet­ter to make an un­no­tice­able lo­cal ex­cep­tion, but keep the de­sired look of the map as a whole.

On my main Moscow metro map, the tick of Смоленская (Smolenskaya) station on the Filyovskaya line sticks out from its line a little bit less than the other ticks on the map.

If I had made this tick as big as the others, it would have tapped the Arbatsko-Pokrovskaya line. Some could have thought that there was a transfer between the stations.

If I made all the ticks on the map as short as this one, the whole map would be less legible.

If I had increased the distance between the two lines, I would have had to enlarge the capsule that designates the following Киевская (Kievskaya) station, which both lines pass. But I didn’t want to make the designation heavier.

In good graphic design, the general affects the particular, not the other way around. Therefore, it is better to make an unnoticeable local exception, but keep the desired look of the map as a whole.

2 pages omitted
2 pages omit­ted

3
The layout

3
The layout

Grapheme

Pas­sen­gers use the map to look for sta­tions and plan routes. To help them, we in­tro­duce color cod­ing, re­move the un­nec­es­sary, or­ga­nize dis­tances, an­gles, and des­ig­na­tions. The re­sult­ing graph­ics have some shape.

A good shape helps to rec­og­nize the map and gives the pas­sen­ger’s eye some points of ref­er­ence. Yuri Suzuki made a cir­cuit board in the shape of the Tube map for Lon­don De­sign Mu­seum. Any­one who is fa­mil­iar with Lon­don will find Green Park sta­tion on the board, even though its name is blocked by a condenser.

Grapheme

Passengers use the map to look for stations and plan routes. To help them, we introduce color coding, remove the unnecessary, organize distances, angles, and designations. The resulting graphics have some shape.

A good shape helps to recognize the map and gives the passenger’s eye some points of reference. Yuri Suzuki made a circuit board in the shape of the Tube map for London Design Museum. Anyone who is familiar with London will find Green Park station on the board, even though its name is blocked by a condenser.

3 pages omitted
3 pages omit­ted
  • Graphemes of Moscow and Chicago transit maps compared to the satellite view of the cities

Of course, the grapheme of a map is ini­tially de­ter­mined by the topol­ogy of the trans­porta­tion net­work it­self, which is in turn de­rived from the city plan. So Moscow and Chicago just had to end up distinctive.

In the case of less “graph­i­cal” cities, it is the de­signer’s job to come up with an idea for the grapheme. If the city does not give any clues, it is pos­si­ble to ar­ti­fi­cially de­sign the eye‑catch­ing con­tours for the map.

Of course, the grapheme of a map is initially determined by the topology of the transportation network itself, which is in turn derived from the city plan. So Moscow and Chicago just had to end up distinctive.

  • Graphemes of Moscow and Chicago transit maps compared to the satellite view of the cities

In the case of less “graphical” cities, it is the designer’s job to come up with an idea for the grapheme. If the city does not give any clues, it is possible to artificially design the eye‑catching contours for the map.

8 pages omitted
8 pages omit­ted

Теxture

Uneven texture of the Berlin map

In the pre­vi­ous chap­ter, I en­cour­aged you to give the el­e­ments of the map a char­ac­ter­is­tic shape, rather than make the in­ter­lac­ing lines into a con­tin­u­ous uni­form pat­tern. The fea­tures of the map should be­come a guide for the eye.

But on the other hand, for a map’s lay­out to feel solid, there needs to be or­der and neat­ness to it. This is achieved by the uni­form den­sity, or tex­ture of the map. Lumps and holes are not suit­able as features.

Uneven texture of the Berlin map

Теxture

In the previous chapter, I encouraged you to give the elements of the map a characteristic shape, rather than make the interlacing lines into a continuous uniform pattern. The features of the map should become a guide for the eye.

But on the other hand, for a map’s layout to feel solid, there needs to be order and neatness to it. This is achieved by the uniform density, or texture of the map. Lumps and holes are not suitable as features.

10 pages omitted
10 pages omit­ted

Draft

Draft

Draft

Draft

Draft

Draft

Some­thing had to be done with these holes.

The hole to the right of the green line was aided to some ex­tent by a text block about Pavelet­sky rail ter­mi­nal. But the one to the left was re­ally helpless.

To fill the left hole, the de­sign­ers re­named the Tul­skaya sta­tion to “The sec­ond sta­tion af­ter the cir­cle, also known as Tul­skaya”. That was a joke, of course; a way to ex­press their frustration.

The de­sign­ers could also have packed more sta­tions above the new cir­cle, MCC, even though in re­al­ity the sta­tions are lo­cated to the south of it. The prob­lem, how­ever, is that an in­ter­change was planned from Na­gatin­skaya to the sta­tion on the MCC. It would need to be in­di­cated on the map soon, so Na­gatin­skaya should be placed close to MCC.

All re­main­ing op­tions were hacks. First, they put the Metro logo in the hole.

Then they de­cided to put a large Moskva River la­bel there.

The making of the Moscow Metro map 3.0. Art. Lebedev Studio

Draft

Draft

Draft

Draft

Draft

Draft

Something had to be done with these holes.

The hole to the right of the green line was aided to some extent by a text block about Paveletsky rail terminal. But the one to the left was really helpless.

To fill the left hole, the designers renamed the Tulskaya station to “The second station after the circle, also known as Tulskaya”. That was a joke, of course; a way to express their frustration.

The designers could also have packed more stations above the new circle, MCC, even though in reality the stations are located to the south of it. The problem, however, is that an interchange was planned from Nagatinskaya to the station on the MCC. It would need to be indicated on the map soon, so Nagatinskaya should be placed close to MCC.

All remaining options were hacks. First, they put the Metro logo in the hole.

Then they decided to put a large Moskva River label there.

The making of the Moscow Metro map 3.0. Art. Lebedev Studio

Designed by Egor Popov and Sergey Chikin, directed by myself. About the project

Without a label

If a par­tic­u­lar ob­ject’s la­bel can be put in dif­fer­ent places, it is a good idea to put it in the area where den­sity is the lowest.

With a label

On our St. Pe­ters­burg Metro map, the la­bel of Ob­vodny Canal is placed in an oth­er­wise no­tice­able empty space be­tween lines.

Without a label

If a particular object’s label can be put in different places, it is a good idea to put it in the area where density is the lowest.

With a label

On our St. Petersburg Metro map, the label of Obvodny Canal is placed in an otherwise noticeable empty space between lines.

Designed by Egor Popov and Sergey Chikin, directed by myself. About the project

2 pages omitted
2 pages omit­ted

Rhythm

Early in his ca­reer, the pub­lisher of this book, Artem Gor­bunov worked as a de­signer in Art. Lebe­dev Stu­dio. He once told a story how with great dif­fi­culty he drew and ap­proved four im­ages for a client’s web­site with the pro­ject’s art di­rec­tor, Ilya Mikhailov.

Artemy Lebe­dev, the stu­dio founder, com­mented on the re­sult: “The pic­tures here are drawn at dif­fer­ent an­gles. You should make it so that when the user moves be­tween the web­site’s sec­tions, the pic­tures ro­tate in the same di­rec­tion and you get a lin­ear sequence”.

One of the pic­tures had to be re­drawn. Artem calls this story one of his most im­por­tant de­sign lessons and writes:

In a good de­sign, all el­e­ments are co­or­di­nated. As tech­nol­ogy ad­vances, more and more co­or­di­nated are the move­ment of me­chan­i­cal parts, fre­quen­cies, tim­ing of in­ter­ac­tion, and over­all struc­ture. In a ma­ture busi­ness, co­or­di­nated are ad­ver­tis­ing, sales, pro­duc­tion, and lo­gis­tics. In ma­ture graphic de­sign, co­or­di­nated are color, mod­u­lar grid, and typography.

Rhythm

Early in his career, the publisher of this book, Artem Gorbunov worked as a designer in Art. Lebedev Studio. He once told a story how with great difficulty he drew and approved four images for a client’s website with the project’s art director, Ilya Mikhailov.

Artemy Lebedev, the studio founder, commented on the result: “The pictures here are drawn at different angles. You should make it so that when the user moves between the website’s sections, the pictures rotate in the same direction and you get a linear sequence”.

One of the pictures had to be redrawn. Artem calls this story one of his most important design lessons and writes:

In a good design, all elements are coordinated. As technology advances, more and more coordinated are the movement of mechanical parts, frequencies, timing of interaction, and overall structure. In a mature business, coordinated are advertising, sales, production, and logistics. In mature graphic design, coordinated are color, modular grid, and typography.

13 pages omitted
13 pages omit­ted

Format

The nat­ural shape of a wa­ter­melon is spher­i­cal. But spher­i­cal wa­ter­mel­ons have prob­lems: they take up space in­ef­fi­ciently and are of­ten dam­aged in transportation.

Peo­ple have learned to grow cu­bic wa­ter­mel­ons, which don’t have these problems.

Format

The natural shape of a watermelon is spherical. But spherical watermelons have problems: they take up space inefficiently and are often damaged in transportation.

People have learned to grow cubic watermelons, which don’t have these problems.

8 pages omitted
8 pages omit­ted

A reader has once sent a map of Do­bryanka’s buses.

A typ­i­cal mis­take is made: a sep­a­rate box is al­lo­cated for the ti­tle and sup­port­ing in­for­ma­tion, while there are mul­ti­ple empty spaces on the sides of the map. The right quar­ter of the map’s width is there just to fit a cou­ple of la­bels that could be placed dif­fer­ently. In gen­eral, the space is used wastefully.

Even if you don’t ad­just the shape of the lines, but rather just shrink the mar­gins and fill the cor­ners, the de­sign gets better.

An­other reader has once sent a map of Vid­noye’s trol­ley­buses. Same mis­take here: there’s a lot of empty space around the lines, but a huge area at the bot­tom is al­lo­cated for sup­port­ing information.

Let’s frame the map more ag­gres­sively, put the ti­tle in the va­cant up­per right cor­ner, and type the sup­port­ing in­for­ma­tion more humbly in the lower right cor­ner. The list of routes can be sim­ply re­moved here.

Before

After

Before

After

A reader has once sent a map of Dobryanka’s buses.

A typical mistake is made: a separate box is allocated for the title and supporting information, while there are multiple empty spaces on the sides of the map. The right quarter of the map’s width is there just to fit a couple of labels that could be placed differently. In general, the space is used wastefully.

Before and after

Even if you don’t adjust the shape of the lines, but rather just shrink the margins and fill the corners, the design gets better.

Another reader has once sent a map of Vidnoye’s trolleybuses. Same mistake here: there’s a lot of empty space around the lines, but a huge area at the bottom is allocated for supporting information.

Before

Let’s frame the map more aggressively, put the title in the vacant upper right corner, and type the supporting information more humbly in the lower right corner. The list of routes can be simply removed here.

After

6 pages omitted
6 pages omit­ted

4
The details

4
The details

Lines

Routes on a map are rep­re­sented with lines, and are of­ten called “lines” as well.

In the sec­ond part of the book we dis­cussed the main vi­sual char­ac­ter­is­tic of a line: its color. We’ll touch upon color once again when we talk about line bun­dles. But in this chap­ter, let’s talk about thick­ness and graphic style.

Lines

Routes on a map are represented with lines, and are often called “lines” as well.

In the second part of the book we discussed the main visual characteristic of a line: its color. We’ll touch upon color once again when we talk about line bundles. But in this chapter, let’s talk about thickness and graphic style.

15 pages omitted
15 pages omit­ted

The pat­tern kind should be con­sis­tent with its sig­nif­i­cance. The 1968 Lon­don map shows the sec­tions un­der con­struc­tion in thin dashed out­lines. Even with­out a leg­end, it is clear that these sec­tions are “not for real” and less im­por­tant than the others.

The 1985 map high­lights sec­tions where trains only run dur­ing rush hours. This de­tail is im­por­tant, but the pat­tern is an­noy­ing to the eye and also looks like a dashed line, as if the sec­tions are un­der con­struc­tion. It would be bet­ter to use a calmer designation.

Sections under construction

Rush hours only

How it could be done: calmer and more like an operating line

Sections under construction

Rush hours only

How it could be done: calmer and more like an operating line

The pattern kind should be consistent with its significance. The 1968 London map shows the sections under construction in thin dashed outlines. Even without a legend, it is clear that these sections are “not for real” and less important than the others.

The 1985 map highlights sections where trains only run during rush hours. This detail is important, but the pattern is annoying to the eye and also looks like a dashed line, as if the sections are under construction. It would be better to use a calmer designation.

Sections under construction

Rush hours only

How it could be done: calmer and more like an operating line

Not only dashed lines, but also trans­par­ent ones read as “not for real”. This is how Art. Lebe­dev Stu­dio des­ig­nates lines un­der con­struc­tion on its St. Pe­ters­burg Metro map.

Sections under construction

Operating lines

Sections under construction

Operating lines

Not only dashed lines, but also transparent ones read as “not for real”. This is how Art. Lebedev Studio designates lines under construction on its St. Petersburg Metro map.

Sections under construction

Operating lines

7 pages omitted
7 pages omit­ted

Bundles

Arduino board connection cable. Voltiq

Sev­eral routes may over­lap, i. e. have sec­tions where they run to­gether. When each route is de­noted by its own line, bun­dles of par­al­lel lines ap­pear on the di­a­gram. And if there are too many of them, they start to look like rib­bon cables.

Bundles

Several routes may overlap, i. e. have sections where they run together. When each route is denoted by its own line, bundles of parallel lines appear on the diagram. And if there are too many of them, they start to look like ribbon cables.

Arduino board connection cable. Voltiq

7 pages omitted
7 pages omit­ted

Here is one more trick that some­times helps to put a bun­dle in order.

Some­times two routes ap­proach an in­ter­sec­tion from op­po­site sides and leave the bun­dle at this intersection.

Lines pairs like these do not have to go along the edge: one can re­place an­other right in the mid­dle of the bun­dle, and there will be no gap. This gives you the free­dom to choose the po­si­tion of these lines in the bundle.

See also: making beautiful bundles in the app Transit

Here is one more trick that sometimes helps to put a bundle in order.

Sometimes two routes approach an intersection from opposite sides and leave the bundle at this intersection.

Lines pairs like these do not have to go along the edge: one can replace another right in the middle of the bundle, and there will be no gap. This gives you the freedom to choose the position of these lines in the bundle.

See also: making beautiful bundles in the app Transit

4 pages omitted
4 pages omit­ted

Sup­pose we have sev­eral lines of dif­fer­ent thick­nesses and styles, and they de­pict routes that run along the same street. It will be dif­fi­cult to make a bun­dle out of such lines.

If you stitch the lines to­gether, it be­comes un­clear what to treat as a sep­a­rate route.

How­ever, even if you add gaps, the de­sign looks am­bigu­ous: a cou­ple of thin lines and is hard to dis­tin­guish from the dou­ble lime line .

What may help is group­ing sim­i­lar lines into sep­a­rate bundles.

It may also be a good idea to get rid of the fully trans­par­ent parts of the lines, re­plac­ing them with lighter shades of their colors.

On line styles:

Suppose we have several lines of different thicknesses and styles, and they depict routes that run along the same street. It will be difficult to make a bundle out of such lines.

If you stitch the lines together, it becomes unclear what to treat as a separate route.

However, even if you add gaps, the design looks ambiguous: a couple of thin lines and is hard to distinguish from the double lime line .

What may help is grouping similar lines into separate bundles.

It may also be a good idea to get rid of the fully transparent parts of the lines, replacing them with lighter shades of their colors.

On line styles:

6 pages omitted
6 pages omit­ted

Bends

Af­ter Henry Beck had stopped work­ing on the Lon­don Tube map, Harold Hutchin­son car­ried the work on. Hutchin­son aban­doned smooth line bends, pre­fer­ring to just “crunch” the lines at the turns.

This is a very bad map. The frac­tures is not the only prob­lem with it, but is one of the most prominent.

About Henry Beck:

Bends

After Henry Beck had stopped working on the London Tube map, Harold Hutchinson carried the work on. Hutchinson abandoned smooth line bends, preferring to just “crunch” the lines at the turns.

This is a very bad map. The fractures is not the only problem with it, but is one of the most prominent.

About Henry Beck:

Designed by Henry Beck, 1933

Turns must be smooth.

Turns must be smooth.

Designed by Henry Beck, 1933

Turns must be clearly vis­i­ble, not ob­scured by the des­ig­na­tions of in­ter­change stations.

This is counter‑in­tu­itive: in­ter­change sta­tions seem to be con­ve­nient piv­ots, and it’s nat­ural to want to con­nect them with straight line seg­ments. But it’s im­por­tant to per­ceive the whole route as one line, not just in­di­vid­ual sec­tions be­tween stations.

If you frac­ture a line un­der an in­ter­change sta­tion, you run into a prob­lem. The color is used to show the re­la­tion be­tween the seg­ments; but the con­ti­nu­ity sug­gest a dif­fer­ent re­la­tion. It’s easy to get “off track”.

For the color‑blind, such map gets com­pletely il­leg­i­ble: it’s im­pos­si­ble to guess which seg­ment con­tin­ues which line.

When the turns are vis­i­ble and lines al­ways pass straight through sta­tions, the eye fol­lows them easily.

This way, the lines stay leg­i­ble even with­out color.

Turns must be clearly visible, not obscured by the designations of interchange stations.

This is counter‑intuitive: interchange stations seem to be convenient pivots, and it’s natural to want to connect them with straight line segments. But it’s important to perceive the whole route as one line, not just individual sections between stations.

If you fracture a line under an interchange station, you run into a problem. The color is used to show the relation between the segments; but the continuity suggest a different relation. It’s easy to get “off track”.

For the color‑blind, such map gets completely illegible: it’s impossible to guess which segment continues which line.

When the turns are visible and lines always pass straight through stations, the eye follows them easily.

This way, the lines stay legible even without color.

On angle grids:

When de­sign­ing a geo­met­ri­cal map, a ques­tion arises: may there be a dou­ble or triple turn? For ex­am­ple, when a 45° grid is used, can you bend a line at a 90° or a 135° angle?

A 90° turn is com­mon. But if there is only one such turn on a map, it may at­tract too much at­ten­tion and look as an in­co­her­ence of the de­sign. If there are sev­eral of them, they look fine.

A 135° turn is ques­tion­able. One may ar­gue that the lines just aren’t plot­ted well if some of them need to al­most turn around and run in the op­po­site direction.

For graph­i­cal unity, a de­signer may con­struct a sharp turn by putting two or three nor­mal ones ad­ja­cently. But this may make things look worse as well by ren­der­ing turns un­rea­son­ably clumsy.

Some­times you can hide the prob­lem by mov­ing a sta­tion to the mid­dle seg­ment of the turn, as shown on the next page.

45°

90°. Fine, if there is more than one turn like this

135°. Questionable

2 × 45°. OK

3 × 45°. Too clumsy

3 × 45°. Too clumsy

45°

90°. Fine, if there is more than one turn like this

135°. Questionable

2 × 45°. OK

3 × 45°. Too clumsy

When designing a geometrical map, a question arises: may there be a double or triple turn? For example, when a 45° grid is used, can you bend a line at a 90° or a 135° angle?

A 90° turn is common. But if there is only one such turn on a map, it may attract too much attention and look as an incoherence of the design. If there are several of them, they look fine.

A 135° turn is questionable. One may argue that the lines just aren’t plotted well if some of them need to almost turn around and run in the opposite direction.

For graphical unity, a designer may construct a sharp turn by putting two or three normal ones adjacently. But this may make things look worse as well by rendering turns unreasonably clumsy.

Sometimes you can hide the problem by moving a station to the middle segment of the turn, as shown on the next page.

On angle grids:

On my Moscow Metro map, the 90° an­gles are al­lowed, but I pre­fer 2 × 45°. The Орехово (Ore­hovo) sta­tion is put in the mid­dle of a turn seg­ment to jus­tify its existence.

On my Moscow Metro map, the 90° angles are allowed, but I prefer 2 × 45°. The Орехово (Orehovo) station is put in the middle of a turn segment to justify its existence.

2004 and 2018
Transport for London

On the 2004 Lon­don Tube map, the frag­ment of the Hammersmith & City line af­ter Liv­er­pool Street turns at 90°, but makes the next 135° turn to Aldgate East in three 45° steps.

On the 2018 map, the same frag­ment looks cleaner, with just one 45° and one 90° turn. This be­came pos­si­ble af­ter sig­nif­i­cant changes in the lay­out of the sur­round­ing lines .

On the 2004 London Tube map, the fragment of the Hammersmith & City line after Liverpool Street turns at 90°, but makes the next 135° turn to Aldgate East in three 45° steps.

On the 2018 map, the same fragment looks cleaner, with just one 45° and one 90° turn. This became possible after significant changes in the layout of the surrounding lines .

2004 and 2018
Transport for London

Sharper curve

Two distinct turns

When a turn is split into seg­ments, those seg­ments must be ap­par­ent, i. e. be of suf­fi­cient length rel­a­tive to the bend’s length. In the first two ex­am­ples, the bends are quite com­pact, so the dou­ble turn looks fine.

Smoother curve

Go figure

If you make the bends smoother and keep seg­ment lengths the same, a dou­ble turn will look man­gled. You no longer see an ob­vi­ous mid­dle frag­ment, in­stead, you see a line drawn by a shaky hand.

You can make the mid­dle seg­ment longer, but then the turn will take even more space.

Sharper curve

Two distinct turns

When a turn is split into segments, those segments must be apparent, i. e. be of sufficient length relative to the bend’s length. In the first two examples, the bends are quite compact, so the double turn looks fine.

Smoother curve

Go figure

If you make the bends smoother and keep segment lengths the same, a double turn will look mangled. You no longer see an obvious middle fragment, instead, you see a line drawn by a shaky hand.

You can make the middle segment longer, but then the turn will take even more space.

The official Moscow Metro map had such bad turn on the Lublinskaya line next to Трубная (Trubnaya) station. Instead of a turn in two steps, there was a mangled line.

In the later ver­sion, the flaw was fixed. Also, note a nice jux­ta­po­si­tion of two 90° turns.

The official Moscow Metro map had such bad turn on the Lublinskaya line next to Трубная (Trubnaya) station. Instead of a turn in two steps, there was a mangled line.

In the later version, the flaw was fixed. Also, note a nice juxtaposition of two 90° turns.

Now let’s talk about how to draw the ac­tual bends.

Imag­ine you are draw­ing a line with your hand us­ing a brush of a cer­tain width. In this case, to make an abrupt turn you will need to in­ter­rupt your mo­tion. In the same way, the eye stum­bles upon such turn.

It’s bet­ter to at least make the line main­tain its width along the bend. Still, the turn is too abrupt.

A sim­ple way to make a bend smooth on a com­puter is radial rounding. In­stead of a cor­ner, an arc of a cir­cle is drawn. The dot • rep­re­sents the cir­cle’s center.

The larger the ra­dius of a cir­cle whose arc is used, the smoother the line and the eas­ier it is for the eye to follow.

But an overly large round­ing takes up too much space on a map, mak­ing it hulky. For a great ship, it is dif­fi­cult to manoeuvre.

Now let’s talk about how to draw the actual bends.

Imagine you are drawing a line with your hand using a brush of a certain width. In this case, to make an abrupt turn you will need to interrupt your motion. In the same way, the eye stumbles upon such turn.

It’s better to at least make the line maintain its width along the bend. Still, the turn is too abrupt.

A simple way to make a bend smooth on a computer is radial rounding. Instead of a corner, an arc of a circle is drawn. The dot • represents the circle’s center.

The larger the radius of a circle whose arc is used, the smoother the line and the easier it is for the eye to follow.

But an overly large rounding takes up too much space on a map, making it hulky. For a great ship, it is difficult to manoeuvre.

When ra­dial round­ing is used, it is a good idea to choose a fixed ra­dius for the whole map for graph­i­cal consistency.

Line bun­dles will re­quire an ex­cep­tion: if you use the same ra­dius for all lines, holes will oc­cur be­tween them.

To re­move the holes, you’ll need to “har­mo­nize” the round­ings by fitting:

  • to the outer one, by re­duc­ing the in­ner ones;

  • to the mid­dle one, by re­duc­ing the in­ner ones and en­larg­ing the outer ones;

  • to the in­ner one, by en­larg­ing the outer ones;

The more lines there are in a bun­dle, the more op­tions you have.

If you treat the neigh­bor­ing bends dif­fer­ently, it will catch the eye.

Har­mo­nize the bends consistently.

When radial rounding is used, it is a good idea to choose a fixed radius for the whole map for graphical consistency.

Line bundles will require an exception: if you use the same radius for all lines, holes will occur between them.

To remove the holes, you’ll need to “harmonize” the roundings by fitting:

  • to the outer one, by reducing the inner ones;

  • to the middle one, by reducing the inner ones and enlarging the outer ones;

  • to the inner one, by enlarging the outer ones;

The more lines there are in a bundle, the more options you have.

If you treat the neighboring bends differently, it will catch the eye.

Harmonize the bends consistently.

Line diagram standard. Radii and angles
Transport for London

The Trans­port for Lon­don stan­dards call for us­ing 45° and 90° turns with ra­dial round­ing with a ra­dius of a triple line width.

In bun­dles, the curves should be fit­ted to the in­ner one, by mak­ing the outer ones larger.

Line diagram standard. Radii and angles
Transport for London

The Transport for London standards call for using 45° and 90° turns with radial rounding with a radius of a triple line width.

In bundles, the curves should be fitted to the inner one, by making the outer ones larger.

There is an­other rea­son to make an ex­cep­tion to the fixed‑ra­dius rule.

When the ra­dius is fixed, the length of an arc is pro­por­tional to the an­gle of a turn. A 45° turn is short, a 90° turn is longer, a 135° turn is too long.

It’s bet­ter to se­lect an ap­pro­pri­ate cor­ner ra­dius for each an­gle. In this ex­am­ple, the ra­dius for the 45° turn is 1,5 times as big as for the 90° turn. For the 135° turn, it’s 1,5 times smaller. That’s nicer.

Ai

Il­lus­tra­tor’s ‘Round cor­ners’ ef­fect has a prob­lem. Only for the 90° turns it uses the radii that you spec­ify. Here, all lines have the same round cor­ners set­ting. How­ever, only the yel­low one is ac­tu­ally built from an arc of that ra­dius. As you see, the 45° turn has a much larger ra­dius; the 135° turn, a much smaller one.

True ra­dial round­ing is achieved with the ‘Live cor­ners’ tool, which ap­peared in the ver­sion 17.1

There is another reason to make an exception to the fixed‑radius rule.

When the radius is fixed, the length of an arc is proportional to the angle of a turn. A 45° turn is short, a 90° turn is longer, a 135° turn is too long.

It’s better to select an appropriate corner radius for each angle. In this example, the radius for the 45° turn is 1,5 times as big as for the 90° turn. For the 135° turn, it’s 1,5 times smaller. That’s nicer.

Ai

Illustrator’s ‘Round corners’ effect has a problem. Only for the 90° turns it uses the radii that you specify. Here, all lines have the same round corners setting. However, only the yellow one is actually built from an arc of that radius. As you see, the 45° turn has a much larger radius; the 135° turn, a much smaller one.

True radial rounding is achieved with the ‘Live corners’ tool, which appeared in the version 17.1

With ra­dial round­ing, a line is con­structed by af­fix­ing three frag­ments to each other: a sec­tion of a straight line, an arc, and a sec­tion of straight line again. This is un­nat­ural: real ob­jects don’t bend like this.

When you bend a steel cane or a shower hose, the cur­va­ture smoothly rises in the di­rec­tion of the cen­ter of the bend­ing. It is im­pos­si­ble to tell where ex­actly the “turn” ends.

With radial rounding, a line is constructed by affixing three fragments to each other: a section of a straight line, an arc, and a section of straight line again. This is unnatural: real objects don’t bend like this.

When you bend a steel cane or a shower hose, the curvature smoothly rises in the direction of the center of the bending. It is impossible to tell where exactly the “turn” ends.

In the be­gin­ning of the chap­ter I said that frac­tured lines look bad. Lines with ra­di­ally‑rounded cor­ners are also frac­tured in a way: once you see the joints be­tween the arc and the straight sec­tion, you won’t be able to “un­see” them.

To smoothen the line in a nat­ual way, you need to pull its Bezier con­trol points to­wards the turn, and move the curve points in an op­po­site di­rec­tion. Don’t overdo this: if a line starts to look like a mac­a­roni tube boiled too soft, make one step back.

In the beginning of the chapter I said that fractured lines look bad. Lines with radially‑rounded corners are also fractured in a way: once you see the joints between the arc and the straight section, you won’t be able to “unsee” them.

To smoothen the line in a natual way, you need to pull its Bezier control points towards the turn, and move the curve points in an opposite direction. Don’t overdo this: if a line starts to look like a macaroni tube boiled too soft, make one step back.

When draw­ing a 90° turn with ra­dial round­ing, the con­trol points stick out about 56% of the radius.

A nice‑look­ing nat­ural curve is usu­ally achieved by pulling them to about 75%.

When drawing a 90° turn with radial rounding, the control points stick out about 56% of the radius.

A nice‑looking natural curve is usually achieved by pulling them to about 75%.

When we were look­ing at ra­dial round­ing, we dis­cussed that it was bet­ter to se­lect dif­fer­ent radii for the turns of dif­fer­ent angles.

The nat­ural, hand‑tuned bends will also need to be sep­a­rately ad­justed for each type of turn.

When we were looking at radial rounding, we discussed that it was better to select different radii for the turns of different angles.

The natural, hand‑tuned bends will also need to be separately adjusted for each type of turn.

Radial

De­pend­ing on the an­gle grid used, you will need to draw by hand a num­ber of dif­fer­ent turn seg­ments. The larger the an­gle, the more pro­nounced is the dif­fer­ence be­tween ra­dial round­ing and nat­ural curves.

30°   60°   120°   150° 

  • 30°

  • 60°

  • 120°

  • 150°

Natural

Depending on the angle grid used, you will need to draw by hand a number of different turn segments. The larger the angle, the more pronounced is the difference between radial rounding and natural curves.

30°   60°   120°   150° 

Radial

Natural

When us­ing nat­ural smooth­ing, the prob­lem of bun­dles man­i­fests it­self in a big­ger way.

As usual, if you nest the bends, holes ap­pear. But un­like with ra­dial round­ing, here, the holes can’t be elim­i­nated by just ad­just­ing the radius.

Here is an un­suc­cess­ful at­tempt to fit all lines to the yel­low one. In some places, gaps are still there; in oth­ers, the lines overlap.

If the curve points are po­si­tioned per­pen­dic­u­larly, you can make the over­lap much less noticeable.

Next, you can cheat by putting the lines un­der each other⁠—no­body will no­tice the trick.

But if you have spac­ing be­tween the lines, you won’t be able to hide the imperfection.

You can tell that lines don’t ide­ally fit each other by look­ing at the shape of the white spac­ing. You will need to ad­just the bends even more carefully.

But let’s get back to the vari­ant with­out spac­ing. We have an­other prob­lem with it: the green line has fractured.

Let’s try to fix it and fit other lines to it. It’s al­most good now, but look at the blue line: its Bezier con­trol points are not pulled to­wards the turn deep enough, and so its bend looks too close to ra­dial. If you had more than four lines, the outer ones would be even worse in this way.

To per­fect the bend, you’ll need to pull the curve points of the outer lines far­ther from the turn to pull their Bezier con­trol points deeper into the an­gle. Now the bend looks good, and this vari­ant will work with a larger num­ber of lines.

When using natural smoothing, the problem of bundles manifests itself in a bigger way.

As usual, if you nest the bends, holes appear. But unlike with radial rounding, here, the holes can’t be eliminated by just adjusting the radius.

Here is an unsuccessful attempt to fit all lines to the yellow one. In some places, gaps are still there; in others, the lines overlap.

If the curve points are positioned perpendicularly, you can make the overlap much less noticeable.

Next, you can cheat by putting the lines under each other⁠—nobody will notice the trick.

But if you have spacing between the lines, you won’t be able to hide the imperfection.

You can tell that lines don’t ideally fit each other by looking at the shape of the white spacing. You will need to adjust the bends even more carefully.

But let’s get back to the variant without spacing. We have another problem with it: the green line has fractured.

Let’s try to fix it and fit other lines to it. It’s almost good now, but look at the blue line: its Bezier control points are not pulled towards the turn deep enough, and so its bend looks too close to radial. If you had more than four lines, the outer ones would be even worse in this way.

To perfect the bend, you’ll need to pull the curve points of the outer lines farther from the turn to pull their Bezier control points deeper into the angle. Now the bend looks good, and this variant will work with a larger number of lines.

We’ve dis­cussed the sit­u­a­tion where a whole bun­dle makes turn.

But what if one of the lines goes straight? In this case, the round­ings dishar­mo­nize un­neatly. If we leave the blue line as if it just was the fourth in a bun­dle, the turn will look too large.

We may draw the bend as if it was the third in the bun­dle, and it will look neater.

An­other op­tion is to smoothen it the same way as the red one. Not too log­i­cal, but looks even better.

Or, we may stop think­ing of it as of a part of the bun­dle and smoothen it in­de­pen­dently, as a sin­gle line.

But the ideal so­lu­tion is to work‑around the prob­lem by re‑ar­rang­ing the lines.

We’ve discussed the situation where a whole bundle makes turn.

But what if one of the lines goes straight? In this case, the roundings disharmonize unneatly. If we leave the blue line as if it just was the fourth in a bundle, the turn will look too large.

We may draw the bend as if it was the third in the bundle, and it will look neater.

Another option is to smoothen it the same way as the red one. Not too logical, but looks even better.

Or, we may stop thinking of it as of a part of the bundle and smoothen it independently, as a single line.

But the ideal solution is to work‑around the problem by re‑arranging the lines.

On the Aus­tralian trains map, the line isn’t drawn well: on the left, the spac­ing be­tween it and the blue line is of un­even width. It’s not ob­vi­ous how to sort the lines to avoid the prob­lem. But if you just make the green line’s round­ing smaller and no longer con­sider it a part of the bun­dle, it will look better.

Even more no­tice­able is the prob­lem on the bus map for Riga. The bends look half‑baked: the de­signer tried to har­mo­nize them, but didn’t succeed.

Riga, Latvia

On the Australian trains map, the line isn’t drawn well: on the left, the spacing between it and the blue line is of uneven width. It’s not obvious how to sort the lines to avoid the problem. But if you just make the green line’s rounding smaller and no longer consider it a part of the bundle, it will look better.

Even more noticeable is the problem on the bus map for Riga. The bends look half‑baked: the designer tried to harmonize them, but didn’t succeed.

Riga, Latvia

The bundles are bent neatly on this Chelyabinsk trams map.

The per­cep­tion of the whole map de­pends on the size of its bends, so it makes sense to ad­just the smooth­ing when look­ing from a distance.

A map with more com­pact, de­ter­mined bends usu­ally looks more rigid, as­sur­ing, and mechanical.

In­creas­ing the size of the bends makes the map friendlier.

On the other hand, the geo­metric­ity grad­u­ally gets lost.

The perception of the whole map depends on the size of its bends, so it makes sense to adjust the smoothing when looking from a distance.

A map with more compact, determined bends usually looks more rigid, assuring, and mechanical.

Increasing the size of the bends makes the map friendlier.

On the other hand, the geometricity gradually gets lost.

When a map is close to its fi­nal form, іt’s time to fine‑tune the size and shape of the bends. But when all of them are hand‑drawn, chang­ing each one just to see if it’s bet­ter to the eye is too much work. Also, there is no way to make sure that all the bends are drawn with­out a mistake.

That’s why it’s im­por­tant to be able to ad­just all the bends simulataneously.

Ai

Tip: make a sym­bol out of a bend. Ad­just the sym­bol to see how the change im­pacts the whole map. Here, I’ve drawn a twirl in­side the bends’s sym­bol, and the whole map in­stantly got twirls. Fun!

About symbols in Illustrator help

When a map is close to its final form, іt’s time to fine‑tune the size and shape of the bends. But when all of them are hand‑drawn, changing each one just to see if it’s better to the eye is too much work. Also, there is no way to make sure that all the bends are drawn without a mistake.

That’s why it’s important to be able to adjust all the bends simulataneously.

Ai

Tip: make a symbol out of a bend. Adjust the symbol to see how the change impacts the whole map. Here, I’ve drawn a twirl inside the bends’s symbol, and the whole map instantly got twirls. Fun!

About symbols in Illustrator help

When there is no an­gle grid and a map is drawn by a free hand, the stan­dard for the bends qual­ity be­come even higher. The beauty that arises from con­sis­tency and uni­for­mity is achiev­able by mere carefulness.

But there is a dif­fer­ent kind of beauty: the one that arises from im­mac­u­late feel and abil­ity to main­tain ten­sion in lines. There is no recipe for this. Graphic de­sign­ers, and even more so, type de­sign­ers, re­fine this feel in decades.

Trams of Odessa, Ukraine, 2016
Art. Lebedev Studio

Trams of Odessa, Ukraine, 2016
Art. Lebedev Studio

When there is no angle grid and a map is drawn by a free hand, the standard for the bends quality become even higher. The beauty that arises from consistency and uniformity is achievable by mere carefulness.

But there is a different kind of beauty: the one that arises from immaculate feel and ability to maintain tension in lines. There is no recipe for this. Graphic designers, and even more so, type designers, refine this feel in decades.

Stops

The sim­plest des­ig­na­tion of a stop is a dot, i.e. a small cir­cle. In math­e­mat­ics, it is also used to de­note any mean­ing­ful point on a graph.

But this des­ig­na­tion only works if the routes are shown as thin lines.

Train No. 13, my design

Train No. 13,
my design

Stops

The simplest designation of a stop is a dot, i.e. a small circle. In mathematics, it is also used to denote any meaningful point on a graph.

But this designation only works if the routes are shown as thin lines.

Train No. 13, my design

2 pages omitted
2 pages omit­ted

Île‑de‑France, 2020. Transilien

Both regular dots and hollow circles are seen on the map of trains in the Paris region.

On the old Berlin maps, the rings are large and the terminal stops are further enlarged.

Hollow circles size variations

Both regular dots and hollow circles are seen on the map of trains in the Paris region.

Île‑de‑France, 2020. Transilien

On the old Berlin maps, the rings are large and the terminal stops are further enlarged.

Hollow circles size variations

4 pages omitted
4 pages omit­ted

To com­plete the pic­ture, let’s look at size vari­a­tions of the painted black cir­cles rel­a­tive to line thickness.

Size variations

For good con­trast, you can paint the cir­cles black or white, de­pend­ing on the color of a par­tic­u­lar line. But this is dan­ger­ous⁠—the reader may think that the color dif­fer­ence means something:

What is spe­cial about the stop on the yel­low line here?

There is usu­ally no rea­son to paint the cir­cles with any color other than black or white.

Size variations

To complete the picture, let’s look at size variations of the painted black circles relative to line thickness.

For good contrast, you can paint the circles black or white, depending on the color of a particular line. But this is dangerous⁠—the reader may think that the color difference means something:

What is special about the stop on the yellow line here?

There is usually no reason to paint the circles with any color other than black or white.

31 pages omitted
31 pages omit­ted

Terminals

A ter­mi­nal is a stop, so you can use the des­ig­na­tions from the pre­vi­ous chap­ter for it.

How­ever, it makes sense to em­pha­size the ends of a route: they are of­ten used as the route’s iden­ti­fiers along with a num­ber or color. When a ve­hi­cle has a dig­i­tal dis­play board, the des­ti­na­tion stop is usu­ally shown there; oth­er­wise, both ends are in­di­cated some­how. At stops, routes are also listed with their num­bers and destinations.

Stockholm. Bus towards Märsta station

Chelyabinsk. Tram on the route 19: Chicherina⁠—Koksohim

Tel Aviv. The next buses go towards the stops: Reading, Central Railway Station, Amidar Ramat Gan.

Terminals

A terminal is a stop, so you can use the designations from the previous chapter for it.

However, it makes sense to emphasize the ends of a route: they are often used as the route’s identifiers along with a number or color. When a vehicle has a digital display board, the destination stop is usually shown there; otherwise, both ends are indicated somehow. At stops, routes are also listed with their numbers and destinations.

Stockholm. Bus towards Märsta station

Chelyabinsk. Tram on the route 19: Chicherina⁠—Koksohim

Tel Aviv. The next buses go towards the stops: Reading, Central Railway Station, Amidar Ramat Gan.

8 pages omitted
8 pages omit­ted

Ter­mi­nals are a good ex­cuse for us­ing ex­trav­a­gant des­ig­na­tions. There usu­ally aren’t too many of them, and most of them are on the pe­riph­ery, so you can have fun with­out com­pro­mis­ing the leg­i­bil­ity of the key information.

De­signer Ro­man Va­trikovsky has come up with very beau­ti­ful ter­mi­nals for his map of Lu­bertsy buses.

Terminals in Chelyabinsk:

Terminals in Chelyabinsk:

Terminals are a good excuse for using extravagant designations. There usually aren’t too many of them, and most of them are on the periphery, so you can have fun without compromising the legibility of the key information.

Designer Roman Vatrikovsky has come up with very beautiful terminals for his map of Lubertsy buses.